New Feminism, yeah? (part 3)
A few had RSVP’d, and Dolores pegged those that had as those that were seated in the folding chairs towards the front of the shabby room. They had their legs crossed and were talking emptily to each other so that she knew they must have come together, or at least told each other to attend. It seemed they didn’t know each other too well, but that was, again probably for the better, since she didn’t want these women to feel pressured to live up to their friends ideas of who they were. She could hear them say, with feigned passing regard “Yeah, we’re not serious, and I like it that way. I like that he will just call me out of the blue when I’m not even thinking about it, you know?”
Dolores wanted to vomit. She didn’t understand this nether-region that women were so happy to occupy. Hers was of the opinion that if one was going to do something, it should be done all the way. Black or white, good guy or bad guy, springtime or autumn, ones or zeroes. Because, like it or not, that is how the human mind operates, always. Categorization was what made the human brain tick, ironically there just wasn’t room for a grey area in there. Dolores thought about a quote from Vonnegut, who put the matter so well when he wrote “It’s practically a law of life that you have to be one or the other? If you aren’t one or the other, you might as well be a doughnut.”
Comments